MPC Member Publications

This database contains a listing of population studies publications written by MPC Members. Anyone can add a publication by an MPC student, faculty, or staff member to this database; new citations will be reviewed and approved by MPC administrators.

Full Citation

Title: Using enrollment records to evaluate self-reports of monthly coverage in the redesigned current population survey health insurance module

Citation Type: Journal Article

Publication Year: 2024

ISSN: 1475-6773

DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14285

PMID: 38263639

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the veracity of self-reports of month-level health insurance coverage in the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS). Data Sources and Study Setting: The CHIME (Comparing Health Insurance Measurement Error) study used health insurance enrollment records from a large regional Midwest insurer as sample for primary data collection in spring 2015. Study Design: A sample of individuals enrolled in a range of public and private coverage types (including Medicaid and marketplace) was administered the CPS health insurance module, which included questions about month-level coverage, by type, over a 17–18-month time span. Survey data was then matched to enrollment records covering that same time frame, and concordance between the records and self-reports was assessed. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Sample was drawn by the insurer's informatics specialists and Census Bureau interviewers conducted the survey. Following data collection, updated enrollment records were matched to the survey data to produce a person-level file of coverage by type at the month-level. Principal Findings: For 91% of the overall sample, coverage status and type were reported accurately for at least 75% of observed months. Results varied somewhat by stability of coverage. Among those who were continuously covered throughout the 17–18 month observation period (which comprised 64% of the overall sample), that level of reporting accuracy was observed for 94% of the sample; for those who had censored spells (34% of the overall sample), the figure was 87%; and among those with gaps and/or changes according to the records (2% of the overall sample), for 82% of the group at least 75% of months were reported accurately. Conclusions: Findings suggest that reporting accuracy of month-level coverage in the CPS is high and that the survey could become a valuable new data source for studying the dynamics of coverage, including the Medicaid unwinding.

Url: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38263639/

User Submitted?: No

Authors: Pascale, Joanne; Fertig, Angela R.; Call, Kathleen Thiede

Periodical (Full): Health services research

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

Countries:

IPUMS NHGIS NAPP IHIS ATUS Terrapop